Putin’s “Incredible Offer” to Trump
Is Even Worse Than Anyone Feared.
The White House is considering
handing over American diplomats to
Putin for questioning.
Outrage
erupts
over
Trump-Putin
‘talk’
about
letting
Russia
interrogate
ex-U.S.
diplomat
By
Samantha
Schmidt
WashingtonPost.com
At
this
week’s
summit
in
Helsinki,
Russian
President
Vladimir
Putin
proposed
what
President
Trump
described
as an
“incredible
offer” —
the
Kremlin
would
give
special
counsel
Robert
S.
Mueller
III
access
to
interviews
with
Russians
indicted
after
allegedly
hacking
Democrats
in 2016.
In
return,
Russia
would be
allowed
to
question
certain
U.S.
officials
it
suspects
of
interfering
in
Russian
affairs.
One
of those
U.S.
officials
is a
former
U.S.
ambassador
to
Moscow,
Michael
McFaul,
a
nemesis
of the
Kremlin
because
of his
criticisms
of
Russia’s
human
rights
record.
On
Wednesday,
White
House
press
secretary
Sarah
Huckabee
Sanders
declined
to rule
out the
Kremlin’s
request
to
question
McFaul
and
other
Americans.
Asked
during
the
daily
press
briefing
whether
President
Trump is
open to
the idea
of
having
McFaul
questioned
by
Russia,
Sanders
said
President
Trump is
“going
to meet
with his
team” to
discuss
the
offer.
“There
was some
conversation
about
it,”
between
Trump
and
Putin,
Sanders
said,
“but
there
wasn’t a
commitment
made on
behalf
of the
United
States.
And the
president
will
work
with his
team,
and
we’ll
let you
know if
there’s
an
announcement
on that
front.”
The
willingness
of the
White
House to
contemplate
handing
over a
former
U.S.
ambassador
for
interrogation
by the
Kremlin
drew ire
and
astonishment
from
current
and
former
U.S.
officials.
Such a
proposition
is
unheard
of. So
is the
notion
that the
president
may
think he
has the
legal
authority
to turn
anyone
over to
a
foreign
power on
his own.
Former
secretary
of state
John F.
Kerry
tweeted
that the
offer
was “not
something
that
should
require
a half
second
of
consultation.
Dangerous.”
“The
administration
needs to
make it
unequivocally
clear
that in
a
million
years
this
wouldn’t
be under
consideration,
period.
Full
stop,”
Kerry
tweeted.
Allowing
such
questioning
of
Americans,
particularly
of a
former
ambassador
who had
diplomatic
protections
while in
Moscow,
would be
an
extraordinary
move on
the part
of the
Trump
administration,
experts
and
officials
said.
“The
entire
country
should
be aware
of
this,”
tweeted
Tom
Nichols,
a
professor
at the
U.S.
Naval
War
College
and the
Harvard
Extension
School.
“If
Putin
can
single
out”
McFaul,
Nichols
said,
“he can
single
out
anyone.
The
President’s
job is
to
protect
us, not
to even
*consider*
handing
any of
us over
to an
enemy
government.”
Even
the
State
Department
considers
the idea
“absolutely
absurd,”
as
department
spokeswoman
Heather
Nauert
said
during a
briefing
when
asked
about
the
Russian
government’s
desire
to
question
11
American
citizens,
including
McFaul.
“We
do not
stand by
those
assertions
that the
Russian
Government
makes,”
Nauert
said,
acknowledging
that the
interrogation
of
American
officials
“would
be a
grave
concern
to our
former
colleagues
here.”
Nauert
added
that a
U.S.
federal
court
rejected
Russian
allegations
against
the
British
businessman
at the
center
of the
Kremlin’s
request,
Bill
Browder.
Back
in the
mid-to-late
2000s,
Kremlin
officials
accused
Browder
of a tax
fraud
scheme
involving
investments
in
Russia.
After
the
death in
a
Russian
prison
of
Browder’s
lawyer,
Sergei
Magnitsky,
Browder
lobbied
for the
Magnitsky
Act,
which
imposed
sanctions
on
Russians
accused
of human
rights
violations.
Russia
later
charged
Browder
with tax
evasion
in
absentia.
[Putin’s
push to
interrogate
U.S.
officials
Russia
accuses
of
crimes,
explained]
FBI
Director
Christopher
A. Wray
also
weighed
in on
Putin’s
proposal.
Asked by
NBC’s
Lester
Holt
during
the
Aspen
Security
Forum on
Wednesday
to
address
the
offer to
send
U.S.
investigators
to
Russia
to
interview
the
indicted
suspects,
Wray
said, “I
never
want to
say
never,
but it’s
certainly
not high
on our
list of
investigative
techniques.”
Regarding
Putin’s
quid pro
quo to
let
Russian
investigators
come to
the U.S.
to
interrogate
Americans,
Wray
said,
“That’s
probably
even
lower on
our list
of
investigative
techniques.”
McFaul
served
as U.S.
ambassador
to
Russia
from
2012 to
2014, a
tumultuous
period
in
relations
between
the two
countries.
President
Barack
Obama
signed
the
Magnitsky
Act into
law in
2012,
prompting
retaliation
from
Russia
that
included
banning
U.S.
adoptions
of
Russian
orphans.
McFaul
was
often
the
target
of
anti-American
attacks
in the
Russian
media,
and said
he ended
up being
Putin’s
“personal
foe.”
“Putin
has been
harassing
me for a
long
time.
That he
now
wants to
arrest
me,
however,
takes it
to a new
level,”
tweeted
McFaul,
who is
now a
Hoover
fellow
at
Stanford
University
and the
director
of the
Freeman
Spogli
Institute
for
International
Studies.
“Even
during
the
Stalin
era, the
Soviet
government
never
had the
audacity
to try
to
arrest
US
government
officials.
Think
about
that.”
“I
hope the
White
House
corrects
the
record
and
denounces
in
categorical
terms
this
ridiculous
request
from
Putin,”
McFaul
wrote.
“Not
doing so
creates
moral
equivalency”
between
a
legitimate
“US
indictment
of
Russian
intelligence
officers
and a
crazy,
completely
fabricated
story
invented
by
Putin.”
Many
U.S.
lawmakers
and
former
diplomatic
officials
came to
McFaul’s
defense
on
Twitter,
and the
hashtag
#ProtectMcFaul
was
trending
late
Wednesday.
“Let’s
recall
why
Putin
began
making
outrageous,
false
accusations
against
@McFaul,”
tweeted
Samantha
Power,
former
U.S.
ambassador
to the
United
Nations.
“Mike
stood up
for
human
rights
and
against
Russian
oppression.
That
terrified
Putin.
The fact
that
@realDonaldTrump
won’t
stand up
for an
American
patriot
is a
travesty.”
Susan E.
Rice,
Obama’s
national
security
adviser,
described
the
White
House’s
statement
regarding
Putin’s
request
“Beyond
outrageous.”
“Amb.
McFaul
served
our
country
honorably
and with
full
diplomatic
immunity,”
Rice
tweeted.
“If the
White
House
cannot
defend
and
protect
our
diplomats,
like our
service
members,
they are
serving
a
hostile
foreign
power
not the
American
people.”
Speaking
to CNN’s
Don
Lemon on
Wednesday,
James
Clapper,
former
director
of
national
intelligence,
described
the
potential
of such
an
exchange
with
Putin as
“crazy.”
“I’ve
never
heard of
such a
thing,”
Clapper
said.
“To turn
over any
U.S.
citizen,
particularly
a former
ambassador,
for the
Russians
to
interrogate
him?
You’ve
got to
be
kidding.”
Rep.
Eric
Swalwell
(D-Calif.)
suggested
that
turning
over
McFaul
for
questioning
would be
grounds
for
impeaching
Trump.
“Take
this to
the
bank,
@realDonaldTrump:
you turn
over
former
U.S.
Ambassador
@McFaul
to
Putin,
you can
count on
me and
millions
others
to
swiftly
make you
an
ex-president,”
Swalwell
tweeted.
“There’s
no
reason
we would
open up
our
evidence
files,
send our
investigators
over
there to
let them
review
that,”
Swalwell
also
told
CNN’s
Erin
Burnett.
“That
would be
like a
victim
allowing
the
burglar
to set
up the
home
security
system.
That’s
ridiculous.”
“This is
so
ludicrous
it
staggers
my
mind,”
tweeted
Steven
L. Hall,
former
CIA
chief of
Russian
operations.
Harry
Litman,
a former
federal
prosecutor,
challenged
the
president’s
power to
hand any
U.S.
citizen
over to
the
Russians.
“How
exactly
does the
President
figure
he can
go about
turning
over
Michael
McFaul,
a
private
citizen,
to the
Russians?
Just
order
him to
go to
Moscow?
Talk
about
broad
theories
of
executive
power,”
he
tweeted.
McFaul
was
protected
with
full
diplomatic
immunity
during
his time
as
ambassador.
If
Secretary
of State
Mike
Pompeo
waives
this
protection,
“he’ll
lose all
support
inside
his
building,”
tweeted
Brian P.
McKeon,
who
served
as
acting
undersecretary
for
policy
at the
Defense
Department
during
the
Obama
administration.
Additionally,
the U.S.
doesn’t
have an
extradition
treaty
with
Russia.
Even if
it did,
a
country
seeking
extradition
of a
U.S.
citizen
has to
justify
its
request
through
the
Justice
Department
and the
U.S.
courts.
The
U.S.
does
have a
mutual
legal
assistance
treaty
“which
requires
the
offense
to be a
crime in
both
countries,”
McKeon
wrote.
It also
allows a
party to
decline
requests
that are
deemed
to
involve
political
crimes,
and
“there
is of
course
no
comparison”
between
the
Justice
Department’s
indictment
of the
Russian
agents
and any
accusations
against
McFaul,
McKeon
argued.