The
Supreme
Court on
Friday
upheld a
law set
to ban
social
media
platform
TikTok
in less
than 48
hours.
Photo by
ABC
News) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme
Court
upholds
TikTok
ban-or-sale
law
slated
to start
Sunday
By Nilay
Seetharaman
Tell Us
USA News
Network
Summary
-Trump
vows his
TikTok
decision
in "not
too
distant
future"
-White
House
signals
Biden
will not
act to
save
TikTok
-Law was
passed
on
national
security
grounds
-TikTok
cites
constitutional
free
speech
safeguards
The
Supreme
Court on
Friday
upheld a
federal
law that
effectively
bans
TikTok
in the
United
States
on
Sunday
unless
the
wildly
popular
video-sharing
app
pulls
off an
unlikely,
last-minute
divestiture
from
Chinese
ownership.
A sale
does not
appear
imminent
and,
although
experts
have
said the
app will
not
disappear
from
existing
users’
phones
once the
law
takes
effect,
new
users
won’t be
able to
download
it and
updates
won’t be
available.
That
will
eventually
render
the app
unworkable,
the
Justice
Department
has said
in court
filings.
“There
is no
doubt
that,
for more
than 170
million
Americans,
TikTok
offers a
distinctive
and
expansive
outlet
for
expression,
means of
engagement
and
source
of
community,”
the
decision
said.
“But
Congress
has
determined
that
divestiture
is
necessary
to
address
its
well-supported
national
security
concerns
regarding
TikTok’s
data
collection
practices
and
relationship
with a
foreign
adversary.”
A
statement
issued
by the
White
House
suggested
that
Biden,
in the
waning
days of
his
presidency,
would
not take
any
action
to save
TikTok
before
the
law's
Sunday
deadline
for
divestiture.
Republican
Donald
Trump,
who
opposed
a TikTok
ban,
succeeds
Biden on
Monday.
"The
Supreme
Court
decision
was
expected,
and
everyone
must
respect
it,"
Trump
said in
a social
media
post.
"My
decision
on
TikTok
will be
made in
the not
too
distant
future,
but I
must
have
time to
review
the
situation.
Stay
tuned!"
While
Trump
has
pledged
to
rescue
the app
from the
ban-or-sale
law, how
he plans
to do so
remains
unclear.
The
press
reported
Wednesday
that the
president-elect
is
exploring
unorthodox
ways to
aid the
platform,
including
issuing
an
executive
order
once he
takes
office
that
would
suspend
enforcement
of the
law for
60 to 90
days.
Legal
experts
have
questioned
whether
an
executive
order
can stop
a law
passed
by
Congress.
Some
digital
rights
groups
slammed
the
court’s
ruling
shortly
after it
was
released.
“Today’s
unprecedented
decision
upholding
the
TikTok
ban
harms
the free
expression
of
hundreds
of
millions
of
TikTok
users in
this
country
and
around
the
world,”
said
Kate
Ruane, a
director
at the
Washington-based
Center
for
Democracy
&
Technology,
which
has
supported
TikTok’s
challenge
to the
federal
law.
Content
creators
who
opposed
the law
also
worried
about
the
effect
on their
business
if
TikTok
shuts
down.
“I’m
very,
very
concerned
about
what’s
going to
happen
over the
next
couple
weeks,”
said
Desiree
Hill,
owner of
Crown’s
Corner
mechanic
shop in
Conyers,
Georgia.
“And
very
scared
about
the
decrease
that I’m
going to
have in
reaching
customers
and
worried
I’m
going to
potentially
lose my
business
in the
next six
months.”
The
justices
heard
arguments
last
Friday,
and a
majority
of them
appeared
satisfied
with the
government’s
position
that the
law was
aimed
not at
TikTok’s
speech
rights
but
rather
at its
ownership.
Noel J.
Francisco,
a lawyer
for
TikTok,
did not
dispute
the
security
risks
but
argued
that the
government
could
address
them
through
other
means
rather
than
effectively
ordering
the app
to “go
dark.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|