Flags
wave
outside
the
Alliance
headquarters
ahead of
a NATO
Defence
Ministers
meeting,
in
Brussels,
Belgium,
October
21,
2021.
REUTERS/Pascal
Rossignol/File
Photo |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Finnish
and NATO
flags
are seen
printed
on paper
this
illustration
taken
April
13,
2022.
REUTERS/Dado
Ruvic/Illustration/File
Photo |
|
Russia
vows
response
as
Finland
seeks
NATO
membership
reuters.com
HELSINKI/KHARKIV,
Ukraine,
May 12
(Reuters)
-
Finland
said on
Thursday
it would
apply to
join
NATO
"without
delay",
with
Sweden
expected
to
follow
suit,
suggesting
Russia's
invasion
of
Ukraine
will
bring
about
the very
expansion
of the
Western
military
alliance
that
Vladimir
Putin
aimed to
prevent.
The
decision
by the
two
Nordic
countries
to
abandon
the
neutrality
they
maintained
throughout
the Cold
War
would be
one of
the
biggest
shifts
in
European
security
in
decades.
Finland's
announcement
drew
fury
from the
Kremlin,
which
called
it a
direct
threat
to
Russia
and
threatened
an
unspecified
response.
It came
even as
Russia's
war in
Ukraine
was
hitting
another
turning
point,
with
Ukrainian
forces
driving
Russian
troops
out of
the
region
around
the
second
largest
city
Kharkiv,
their
fastest
advance
since
forcing
Russia
to
withdraw
from the
capital
and
northeast
more
than a
month
ago.
NATO
Secretary-General
Jens
Stoltenberg
said the
Finns
would be
"warmly
welcomed"
and
promised
an
accession
process
that
would be
"smooth
and
swift".
Finnish
membership
would
boost
both
Finland's
security
and that
of the
alliance,
he said.
Finland
and
Sweden
are the
two
biggest
EU
countries
that had
yet to
join
NATO,
and
Finland's
1,300-km
(800-mile)
border
will
more
than
double
the
frontier
between
the
U.S.-led
alliance
and
Russia,
putting
NATO
guards a
few
hours'
drive
from the
northern
outskirts
of St
Petersburg.
"Finland
must
apply
for NATO
membership
without
delay,"
President
Sauli
Niinisto
and
Prime
Minister
Sanna
Marin
said in
a joint
statement.
"We hope
that the
national
steps
still
needed
to make
this
decision
will be
taken
rapidly
within
the next
few
days."
Asked
whether
Finland's
accession
to NATO
posed a
direct
threat
to
Russia,
Kremlin
spokesman
Dmitry
Peskov
said:
"Definitely.
NATO
expansion
does not
make our
continent
more
stable
and
secure.
"This
cannot
fail to
arouse
our
regret,
and is a
reason
for
corresponding
symmetrical
responses
on our
side,"
he
added,
without
specifying
the
possible
responses.
Russian
officials
have
spoken
in the
past
about
measures
including
potentially
stationing
nuclear-armed
missiles
on the
Baltic
Sea.
TURNING
POINT
Five
diplomats
and
officials
told
Reuters
that
NATO
allies
expect
both
countries
to be
granted
membership
quickly,
paving
the way
for an
increased
troop
presence
in the
Nordic
region
to
defend
them
during a
one-year
ratification
period.
read
more
Putin
cited
NATO's
potential
expansion
as one
of the
main
reasons
for
Moscow's
"special
military
operation"
in
Ukraine
he
launched
in
February.
Ukraine
has long
sought
to join
NATO,
although
it has
lately
offered
to
accept
some
form of
neutral
status
as part
of peace
talks.
NATO
describes
itself
as a
defensive
alliance,
built
around a
treaty
declaring
that an
attack
on one
member
is an
attack
on all,
which
effectively
grants
U.S.
allies
the
protection
of
American
superpower
might,
including
its
nuclear
arsenal.
Moscow
regards
that as
a threat
to its
influence
in
neighbouring
countries.
But
Putin's
decision
to
invade
Ukraine
has
caused a
shift in
public
opinion
in the
Nordic
region,
with
political
parties
that had
backed
neutrality
for
generations
now
coming
to
embrace
the view
that
Russia
is a
menace.
UKRAINIAN
COUNTER-ATTACK
On the
front
lines,
Ukraine
has
mounted
a bold
counter-offensive
in
recent
days
that has
ousted
Russian
forces
from
villages
north
and east
of
Kharkiv,
where
Russian
troops
had held
the
outskirts
since
the
beginning
of the
invasion.
Reuters
journalists
have
confirmed
in
recent
days
that
Ukraine
is now
in
control
of
territory
on the
banks of
the
Siverskiy
Donets
River,
around
40 km
(25
miles)
from
Kharkiv.
To the
north,
the
Ukrainians
have
been
pushing
towards
the
Russian
border.
In the
latest
advance,
they
announced
on
Wednesday
the
recapture
of the
village
of
Pytomnyk,
halfway
to the
Russian
frontier
along
the main
highway
north of
Kharkiv.
"The
withdrawal
of
Russian
forces
from the
Kharkiv
Oblast
(region)
is a
tacit
recognition
of
Russia’s
inability
to
capture
key
Ukrainian
cities
where
they
expected
limited
resistance
from the
population,"
Britain's
defence
ministry
said in
an
update
on
Thursday.
Ukraine's
general
staff
said in
an
update
overnight
that the
Russians
were
regrouping
"in
order to
prevent
our
forces
from
advancing
further"
around
Kharkiv,
with
combat
under
way
where
Russian
troops
had
crossed
the
Siverskiy
Donets.
Ukraine's
advances
near
Kharkiv
could
put some
of
Russia's
main
supply
lines to
eastern
Ukraine,
located
on the
far bank
of the
river,
within
range of
Ukrainian
artillery,
and even
allow it
to
bombard
staging
areas
inside
Russia.
Both
sides
reported
strikes
overnight
across
the
Russia-Ukraine
border,
which
Reuters
was not
able to
confirm.
Ukrainian
officials
reported
shelling
across
the
frontier
from the
Russian
border
town of
Tyotkino,
and air
strikes
that
killed
and
wounded
civilians
in the
northern
Ukrainian
city of
Novhorod-Siversky.
Russia
said one
person
was
killed
and
seven
wounded
in
Solokhi,
a
village
in the
Belgorod
border
region.
Elsewhere,
the
Ukraine
general
staff
said
Russia
had had
some
success
advancing
towards
Kudryashivka
and
Sievierodonetsk,
part of
Moscow's
main
assault
in the
eastern
Donbas
region.
Air
strikes
were
continuing
on
Azovstal,
a giant
steelworks
in the
ruined
southeastern
port
city of
Mariupol
where
Ukrainian
defenders
have
been
making a
last
stand.
In the
hamlet
of
Vilkhivka
on
Kharkiv's
eastern
outskirts,
the
Ukrainian
advance
had made
it
possible
for
residents
to
return
to comb
through
the
wreckage
of homes
destroyed
in heavy
fighting
weeks
ago.
A
grizzled
pensioner
recounted
how
Russian
troops
had used
him and
other
villagers
as human
shields
before
retreating
after
fierce
fighting.
read
more
“Can
they
really
be
called
real
soldiers
after
that?”
he spat.
“They
are
motherfuckers,
not
military
men!”
Reporting
by
Reuters
bureaus
Writing
by Peter
Graff
Editing
by Mark
Heinrich
Our
Standards:
The
Thomson
Reuters
Trust
Principles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|